How to explain the existence of Allah?
The first episode
How the universe originated, where it took place, and how laws maintain its order and balance have always been of interest to scientists and thinkers who have constantly thought about this and developed a number of theories. The idea that existed until the beginning of the twentieth century was that the universe was of infinite size, that it was from eternity, and that it would last forever. The universe did not have a beginning or an end according to this erroneous view, known as the "model of the static universe." Laying the groundwork for materialist philosophy, this erroneous view foolishly denied the apparent existence of God and viewed the universe as a collection of fixed, stable, and unchanging matter. Materialism is a system of erroneous thinking that considers the matter to be an absolute entity and denies the existence of anything other than matter. It has its roots in ancient Greece, and as it gained increasing acceptance in the nineteenth century, this method of thought became famous in the form of Karl Marx's dialectical materialism. As we have said before, the model of the stable universe of the nineteenth century laid the foundation for materialist philosophy. In his book Principles Fundamentals de Philosophy, George Politzar based a misconception on the basis of this unscientific model of the universe, namely, "the universe was not a created thing" and added: If it is, it must be created immediately by God and brought into existence from nothing. In order to acknowledge creation, one must first acknowledge the existence of moments in which the universe did not exist, and something that came out of existence. This is something that science cannot access.1 When Politzer asserted that the universe was not created by shamelessness, he relied on the nineteenth-century fixed universe model and thought he was making scientific claims. However, the evolving science and technology of the twentieth century have shattered the primitive notion of a stable universe model that laid the foundation for materialists. Today, in the early twenty-first century, modern physics has proved by many experiments, and calculations, that the universe had a beginning and that it was not created by creating anything in a big explosion. The beginning of the universe was that it meant that the universe was created out of something, that is, it was created. If a created thing exists (which did not exist before) then it must have a creator. Something impenetrable to the human mind from non-existence. Therefore, it is very different from assembling objects to form a new object (such as a work of art or technological innovation) that came from non-existence. It is the only sign of God's creation that everything was created perfectly at once and in a single moment when there was no previous example of the created thing and there was not even the time and place that could create it. The arrival of the universe from existence is the greatest proof of this. Considering this fact a lot will change. It helps people understand the meaning of life and review their perspectives and motives. This is why many scientific communities have tried to ignore the fact of creation which they do not fully understand, even though the evidence was clear to them. All the scientific evidence pointing to the existence of a Creator compelled them to discover alternatives and thus to confuse the human mind. Nevertheless, the evidence of science itself brings a definite conclusion to these theories. Now, let us take a brief look at the process of scientific evolution through which the universe originated.
Expansion of the Universe In 1999, while American astronomer Edwin Hubble was working at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California, he made one of the most important discoveries in the history of astronomy. By observing several stars through his giant telescope, he discovered that their light had gone to the red end of the spectrum, and most likely, this space was directly related to the distance of the stars from Earth. This discovery had an electrical effect on the world of science because, according to the accepted laws of physics, the spectrum of a light beam traveling at a point of observation tends to be purple while the spectrum of a light beam moving away from the observation point tends to be red. During Hubble's observations, the starlight turned red, meaning that it was constantly moving away from us. Not long ago Hubble made another important discovery; The stars weren’t just running away from Earth; They were running away from each other. The only conclusion that can be drawn from a universe where everything moves away from everything is that the universe is constantly "expanding". To better understand, the universe can be thought of as blowing up the surface of a balloon. As the points on the surface of the balloon move away from each other, as the balloon inflates, so do the objects in space separate from each other as the universe expands. In fact, it was theoretically discovered even earlier. Albert Einstein, considered the greatest scientist of the century, came to the conclusion after calculations in theoretical physics that the universe could not be fixed. However, he kept his discovery at rest so as not to conflict with the widely recognized static universe model of his time. Einstein has later branded his performance as "the biggest mistake of his career." Later, it became clear by Hubble's observation that the universe was expanding. So, what was the significance of the expansion of the universe upon the existence of the universe? The expansion of the universe indicated that if it could travel backward in time, the evidence for the emergence of the universe came from a single point. The calculations showed that this "single point" which covered all the things in the universe should have "zero volume" and "infinite density" universe, caused by the explosion of this single point with zero volume. This great explosion marked the beginning of the universe. ", And the theory began to be called so-called. It should be noted that "zero volume" is one of the descriptive purposes. Theoretical revelation. Science can define the concept of "nothing", which transcends the limits of human perception, simply by expressing "a point with zero volume," really, "no pointless point", it is not "nothingness", "universe miracle" Came into being from. In other words, it was created. The Big Bang theory showed that in the beginning, all objects in the universe were one piece and that This fact, revealed by the Big Bang theory, was stated in the Qur'an 15 centuries ago when people had minimal knowledge of the universe: do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth came together (as a unit of creation) before We clove them? Divided into two? We made every living thing from water. Will, they do not believe it? (Surat al-Anbiya, 30) As stated in the verse, everything, even the "heavens and the earth" which have not yet been created, was created with a big bang and began to split and shape the present universe from each other. When we compare the information given in the verse with the Big Bang theory, we see that they completely agree with each other. However, the Big Bang was introduced as a scientific theory only in the 20th century. The expansion of the universe is one of the most important parts of the proof that the universe was created by nothing. Although this fact has not been discovered by science until the twentieth century, God has revealed to us this fact in the Qur'an, published 15,000 years ago: We are the ones who (with our creative) energy created the universe I'm doing.
The Big Bang has been proven by a lot of evidence
As has been clearly seen; The Big Bang theory proves that the universe was ‘not created out of nothing’, in other words, it was created by God. For this reason, astronomers continued to protest against the Big Bang in its fight to maintain a fundamental rule of their ideals committed to materialist philosophy. The reason was made clear by the eminent physicist Arthur Eddington, who said: "Philosophically, the idea of a sudden onset of the current order of nature is deceptive to me." 2 Sir Fred Wheel was one of those who were annoyed by the Big Bang Theory. In the middle of the century, Howell championed a theory called the "steady-state theory," which was similar to the nineteenth-century "constant universe" method. It was completely different from the Big Bang theory, which said that the universe is one Initially, those who defended the stable-state theory remained steadfast. Studies have shown that stars and galaxies move away from us and away from each other, meaning that the universe expands. This suggests that when time moves backward, the universe proves that it started from a single point. Opposed to the Big Bang year after year. Science, of course, was working against them. In 1948, George Gamov came up with another idea about the Big Bang. If the universe is formed by a sudden, catastrophic explosion, then a certain amount of radiation must remain from that explosion. This radiation is identifiable and, moreover, it should be uniform throughout the universe. Evidence of 'should have existed' was soon available.
Cosmetic background radiation
In 1965, two researchers, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a type of radiation that had never been seen before. This radiation, known as "cosmic background radiation", did not appear to have been emitted from any specific source but rather spread throughout the space. It was soon realized that this radiation was an echo of the Big Bang, still returning from the first moment of that great explosion. Penzias and Wilson received the Nobel Prize for their discovery. In 1989, NASA sent the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite to study cosmic background radiation. Satellite-powered sensors took just eight minutes to detect and confirm the levels of radiation reported by Penzias and Wilson. Kobe found the wreckage of the explosion that occurred at the beginning of the universe. Defined as the greatest astronomical discovery of all time, this discovery clearly proves the Big Bang theory. Investigations into the COB2 satellite launched into space after the COB satellite confirmed the calculations based on the Big Bang. More evidence of the Big Bang was imminent. One-piece had a relative amount of hydrogen and helium in the universe.
Observations indicate that the hydrogen-helium concentration in the universe was consistent with the theoretical calculation of what should have been after the Big Bang. This posed another risk to the heart of the stable-state theory because if the universe had existed for eternity and never started, all its hydrogen would have been burned in helium. Because of all this strong evidence, the Big Bang theory was adopted by the scientific community. The Big Bang model was the latest in the science of the formation and origin of the universe. Defending the steadfast-state theory alongside Fred Whale year after year, Dennis Siama described the final position they reached after revealing all the evidence of the Big Bang theory. Schama said he took part in a heated debate between the defenders of the unwavering-state theory and those who tested it in the hope of refuting it. He further added that he defended the static-state theory, not because he thought it was valid, but because he wanted it to be valid. Fred Whale stood up against all objections as soon as he began to present evidence against this theory. Schama added that he had initially taken a stand with Whale, but as soon as he began to gather evidence, he had to admit that the game was over and that Professor George Abel had to dismiss the unshakable state theory. The University of California further states that the available evidence shows that the universe originated from the Big Bang billions of years ago. He admits that he has no choice but to accept the Big Bang theory. With the victory of the Big Bang, the concept of 'eternal matter', which formed the basis of materialist philosophy, was thrown into the rubbish heap of history. What was before the Big Bang and what was the force that made the universe "non-existent" in this explosion? This question certainly implies, in the words of Arthur Eddington, the ‘philosophically hostile’ truth to materialists, which is the existence of a Creator. Philosopher Anthony Fleu, a former atheist who later declared that he believed in the apparent existence of God, commented on the issue: Infamy, confession is better for the soul. Therefore, I will begin by acknowledging that the Stratonian atheist must be embarrassed by the contemporary cosmological consensus. For it seems that cosmologists are providing scientific evidence that St. Thomas could not be philosophically proven; Namely, there was a beginning of the universe. Unless the universe can be considered spiritually as having no beginning but no end in comfort, it is easy to request that its brutal existence, and whatever is found as its main feature, should be accepted as an explanatory void. While I believe this is still true, maintaining this position in the face of the Big Bang story is certainly not easy or comfortable. Many scientists who do not blindly claim to be atheists have acknowledged the role of the Almighty Creator in the creation of the universe. This Creator is certainly the one who created both matter and time, yet is independent of both. Well-known astronomer Hugh Ross states: According to the cosmological theorem, if the beginning of time coincides with the beginning of the universe, then the cause of the universe must exist in a certain time scale and the cosmic time dimension will work with existence. This conclusion is very important for our understanding of [God] ... It tells us that God Himself is not the universe, nor is God included in the universe. Subject matter and time have been created by the Almighty Creator who is distinct from all these concepts. This is Allah, the Creator, Lord of the heavens, and the earth.
Moving balances in space are true,
The Big Bang caused more problems for materialists than the above confessions of Anthony Fleur. The Big Bang not only proves that the universe was created out of something, but it was also created in a highly planned, systematic, and controlled way. The Big Bang happened with all the matter and energy in the universe and it's splitting into space in all directions at breakneck speed. From this matter and energy, a great balance was created consisting of galaxies, stars, sun, earth, and all other celestial bodies. Moreover, the laws were formed under the name of 'laws of physics', which are uniform and do not change throughout the universe. All this indicates that a perfect order arose after the Big Bang. The explosions, however, do not order. The presence of all observable explosions has a tendency to cause damage, chaos, and destruction. For example, nuclear and hydrogen bomb explosions, fire-damp explosions, volcanic eruptions, natural gas explosions, solar explosions: all of these have devastating effects. For example if we are introduced to a very wide order after an explosion if an explosion under the ground encourages huge works of art, huge palaces, or enclosed houses - can we conclude that there was a higher intelligence behind this explosion? And all the pieces scattered in the explosion were removed in a very controlled manner. This statement by Sir Fred Whale, who admitted his mistake many years after opposing the Big Bang Theory, illustrates the situation very well: The Big Bang Theory holds that the universe began in a single explosion. Yet as seen below, an explosion simply rips apart the subject, the Big Bang mysteriously creating the opposite effect as the matter spreads together in the form of galaxies. Noting that the Big Bang's way of ordering is retrograde, he certainly explains the Big Bank with a materialistic bias and assumes that it is an "uncontrolled explosion." In fact, he became self-contradictory with this kind of statement to refute the existence of the Creator. Because if a great order was raised about an explosion, the concept of "uncontrolled explosion" should have been kept separate and it should be accepted that the explosion was extraordinarily controlled, in other words, Almighty Allah initiated this explosion. Another aspect of this extraordinary order in the universe after the Big Bang is that the conditions for the formation of habitable planets in the "habitable universe" are so many and so complex that it is almost impossible to imagine that this formation is a coincidence. Paul Davis, a renowned professor of theoretical physics, calculated how the speed of expansion after the Big Bang was "subtly tuned" and he came to an incredible conclusion. According to Davis, if the rate of expansion after the Big Bang were separated by estimates of more than one billion to one billion, no habitable star-like structure could be formed: careful measurement kept the rate of expansion very close to criticism Whose value will expand. Slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly. It is interesting to ask precisely how finely the rate of expansion has been ‘in fine-tune’ for reading on this narrow dividing line between the two catastrophes? If at the time of I S (the pattern of expansion in that period was already firmly established) then the rate of expansion differs from its actual value by more than 10-18, it would be enough to throw the delicate balance. Clearly, there was no loud bang, but an explosion of wonderfully arranged vastness.7. The laws of physics that came together with the Big Bang have not changed completely for 15 billion years. Moreover, these laws are so carefully calculated that one millimeter of separation from their current values could result in the destruction of the entire structure and configuration of the universe.
Renowned physicist Professor Stephen Hawking, in his book A Brief History of Time, states that the universe has been determined by calculation and that balance has been more accurately preserved than we have imagined. Hawking says about the rate of expansion of the universe: If the rate of expansion per second after the Big Bang were smaller than one-millionth of a millionth, the universe would have split again before it reached its present size.8 Paul Davis also explained this remarkably accurate balance and the inevitable result Made: The current structure of the universe, for small changes in numbers Sensitive, however, it is difficult to resist the notion that the seemingly miraculous conformity of the numerical values that nature has determined to its fundamental constants must be the most striking evidence for the cosmic design element. An American professor wrote to him MIBOTIC UNIVERSE BOOK: After surveying all the evidence, the thought arose that some supernatural entity or agency could be called - this mind must be connected with Allah, the Almighty. Allah is the One who created everything with perfect order and perfect measure.
How the universe originated, where it took place, and how laws maintain its order and balance have always been of interest to scientists and thinkers who have constantly thought about this and developed a number of theories. The idea that existed until the beginning of the twentieth century was that the universe was of infinite size, that it was from eternity, and that it would last forever. The universe did not have a beginning or an end according to this erroneous view, known as the "model of the static universe." Laying the groundwork for materialist philosophy, this erroneous view foolishly denied the apparent existence of God and viewed the universe as a collection of fixed, stable, and unchanging matter. Materialism is a system of erroneous thinking that considers the matter to be an absolute entity and denies the existence of anything other than matter. It has its roots in ancient Greece, and as it gained increasing acceptance in the nineteenth century, this method of thought became famous in the form of Karl Marx's dialectical materialism. As we have said before, the model of the stable universe of the nineteenth century laid the foundation for materialist philosophy. In his book Principles Fundamentals de Philosophy, George Politzar based a misconception on the basis of this unscientific model of the universe, namely, "the universe was not a created thing" and added: If it is, it must be created immediately by God and brought into existence from nothing. In order to acknowledge creation, one must first acknowledge the existence of moments in which the universe did not exist, and something that came out of existence. This is something that science cannot access.1 When Politzer asserted that the universe was not created by shamelessness, he relied on the nineteenth-century fixed universe model and thought he was making scientific claims. However, the evolving science and technology of the twentieth century have shattered the primitive notion of a stable universe model that laid the foundation for materialists. Today, in the early twenty-first century, modern physics has proved by many experiments, and calculations, that the universe had a beginning and that it was not created by creating anything in a big explosion. The beginning of the universe was that it meant that the universe was created out of something, that is, it was created. If a created thing exists (which did not exist before) then it must have a creator. Something impenetrable to the human mind from non-existence. Therefore, it is very different from assembling objects to form a new object (such as a work of art or technological innovation) that came from non-existence. It is the only sign of God's creation that everything was created perfectly at once and in a single moment when there was no previous example of the created thing and there was not even the time and place that could create it. The arrival of the universe from existence is the greatest proof of this. Considering this fact a lot will change. It helps people understand the meaning of life and review their perspectives and motives. This is why many scientific communities have tried to ignore the fact of creation which they do not fully understand, even though the evidence was clear to them. All the scientific evidence pointing to the existence of a Creator compelled them to discover alternatives and thus to confuse the human mind. Nevertheless, the evidence of science itself brings a definite conclusion to these theories. Now, let us take a brief look at the process of scientific evolution through which the universe originated.
Expansion of the Universe In 1999, while American astronomer Edwin Hubble was working at the Mount Wilson Observatory in California, he made one of the most important discoveries in the history of astronomy. By observing several stars through his giant telescope, he discovered that their light had gone to the red end of the spectrum, and most likely, this space was directly related to the distance of the stars from Earth. This discovery had an electrical effect on the world of science because, according to the accepted laws of physics, the spectrum of a light beam traveling at a point of observation tends to be purple while the spectrum of a light beam moving away from the observation point tends to be red. During Hubble's observations, the starlight turned red, meaning that it was constantly moving away from us. Not long ago Hubble made another important discovery; The stars weren’t just running away from Earth; They were running away from each other. The only conclusion that can be drawn from a universe where everything moves away from everything is that the universe is constantly "expanding". To better understand, the universe can be thought of as blowing up the surface of a balloon. As the points on the surface of the balloon move away from each other, as the balloon inflates, so do the objects in space separate from each other as the universe expands. In fact, it was theoretically discovered even earlier. Albert Einstein, considered the greatest scientist of the century, came to the conclusion after calculations in theoretical physics that the universe could not be fixed. However, he kept his discovery at rest so as not to conflict with the widely recognized static universe model of his time. Einstein has later branded his performance as "the biggest mistake of his career." Later, it became clear by Hubble's observation that the universe was expanding. So, what was the significance of the expansion of the universe upon the existence of the universe? The expansion of the universe indicated that if it could travel backward in time, the evidence for the emergence of the universe came from a single point. The calculations showed that this "single point" which covered all the things in the universe should have "zero volume" and "infinite density" universe, caused by the explosion of this single point with zero volume. This great explosion marked the beginning of the universe. ", And the theory began to be called so-called. It should be noted that "zero volume" is one of the descriptive purposes. Theoretical revelation. Science can define the concept of "nothing", which transcends the limits of human perception, simply by expressing "a point with zero volume," really, "no pointless point", it is not "nothingness", "universe miracle" Came into being from. In other words, it was created. The Big Bang theory showed that in the beginning, all objects in the universe were one piece and that This fact, revealed by the Big Bang theory, was stated in the Qur'an 15 centuries ago when people had minimal knowledge of the universe: do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth came together (as a unit of creation) before We clove them? Divided into two? We made every living thing from water. Will, they do not believe it? (Surat al-Anbiya, 30) As stated in the verse, everything, even the "heavens and the earth" which have not yet been created, was created with a big bang and began to split and shape the present universe from each other. When we compare the information given in the verse with the Big Bang theory, we see that they completely agree with each other. However, the Big Bang was introduced as a scientific theory only in the 20th century. The expansion of the universe is one of the most important parts of the proof that the universe was created by nothing. Although this fact has not been discovered by science until the twentieth century, God has revealed to us this fact in the Qur'an, published 15,000 years ago: We are the ones who (with our creative) energy created the universe I'm doing.
The Big Bang has been proven by a lot of evidence
As has been clearly seen; The Big Bang theory proves that the universe was ‘not created out of nothing’, in other words, it was created by God. For this reason, astronomers continued to protest against the Big Bang in its fight to maintain a fundamental rule of their ideals committed to materialist philosophy. The reason was made clear by the eminent physicist Arthur Eddington, who said: "Philosophically, the idea of a sudden onset of the current order of nature is deceptive to me." 2 Sir Fred Wheel was one of those who were annoyed by the Big Bang Theory. In the middle of the century, Howell championed a theory called the "steady-state theory," which was similar to the nineteenth-century "constant universe" method. It was completely different from the Big Bang theory, which said that the universe is one Initially, those who defended the stable-state theory remained steadfast. Studies have shown that stars and galaxies move away from us and away from each other, meaning that the universe expands. This suggests that when time moves backward, the universe proves that it started from a single point. Opposed to the Big Bang year after year. Science, of course, was working against them. In 1948, George Gamov came up with another idea about the Big Bang. If the universe is formed by a sudden, catastrophic explosion, then a certain amount of radiation must remain from that explosion. This radiation is identifiable and, moreover, it should be uniform throughout the universe. Evidence of 'should have existed' was soon available.
Cosmetic background radiation
In 1965, two researchers, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered a type of radiation that had never been seen before. This radiation, known as "cosmic background radiation", did not appear to have been emitted from any specific source but rather spread throughout the space. It was soon realized that this radiation was an echo of the Big Bang, still returning from the first moment of that great explosion. Penzias and Wilson received the Nobel Prize for their discovery. In 1989, NASA sent the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite to study cosmic background radiation. Satellite-powered sensors took just eight minutes to detect and confirm the levels of radiation reported by Penzias and Wilson. Kobe found the wreckage of the explosion that occurred at the beginning of the universe. Defined as the greatest astronomical discovery of all time, this discovery clearly proves the Big Bang theory. Investigations into the COB2 satellite launched into space after the COB satellite confirmed the calculations based on the Big Bang. More evidence of the Big Bang was imminent. One-piece had a relative amount of hydrogen and helium in the universe.
Observations indicate that the hydrogen-helium concentration in the universe was consistent with the theoretical calculation of what should have been after the Big Bang. This posed another risk to the heart of the stable-state theory because if the universe had existed for eternity and never started, all its hydrogen would have been burned in helium. Because of all this strong evidence, the Big Bang theory was adopted by the scientific community. The Big Bang model was the latest in the science of the formation and origin of the universe. Defending the steadfast-state theory alongside Fred Whale year after year, Dennis Siama described the final position they reached after revealing all the evidence of the Big Bang theory. Schama said he took part in a heated debate between the defenders of the unwavering-state theory and those who tested it in the hope of refuting it. He further added that he defended the static-state theory, not because he thought it was valid, but because he wanted it to be valid. Fred Whale stood up against all objections as soon as he began to present evidence against this theory. Schama added that he had initially taken a stand with Whale, but as soon as he began to gather evidence, he had to admit that the game was over and that Professor George Abel had to dismiss the unshakable state theory. The University of California further states that the available evidence shows that the universe originated from the Big Bang billions of years ago. He admits that he has no choice but to accept the Big Bang theory. With the victory of the Big Bang, the concept of 'eternal matter', which formed the basis of materialist philosophy, was thrown into the rubbish heap of history. What was before the Big Bang and what was the force that made the universe "non-existent" in this explosion? This question certainly implies, in the words of Arthur Eddington, the ‘philosophically hostile’ truth to materialists, which is the existence of a Creator. Philosopher Anthony Fleu, a former atheist who later declared that he believed in the apparent existence of God, commented on the issue: Infamy, confession is better for the soul. Therefore, I will begin by acknowledging that the Stratonian atheist must be embarrassed by the contemporary cosmological consensus. For it seems that cosmologists are providing scientific evidence that St. Thomas could not be philosophically proven; Namely, there was a beginning of the universe. Unless the universe can be considered spiritually as having no beginning but no end in comfort, it is easy to request that its brutal existence, and whatever is found as its main feature, should be accepted as an explanatory void. While I believe this is still true, maintaining this position in the face of the Big Bang story is certainly not easy or comfortable. Many scientists who do not blindly claim to be atheists have acknowledged the role of the Almighty Creator in the creation of the universe. This Creator is certainly the one who created both matter and time, yet is independent of both. Well-known astronomer Hugh Ross states: According to the cosmological theorem, if the beginning of time coincides with the beginning of the universe, then the cause of the universe must exist in a certain time scale and the cosmic time dimension will work with existence. This conclusion is very important for our understanding of [God] ... It tells us that God Himself is not the universe, nor is God included in the universe. Subject matter and time have been created by the Almighty Creator who is distinct from all these concepts. This is Allah, the Creator, Lord of the heavens, and the earth.
Moving balances in space are true,
The Big Bang caused more problems for materialists than the above confessions of Anthony Fleur. The Big Bang not only proves that the universe was created out of something, but it was also created in a highly planned, systematic, and controlled way. The Big Bang happened with all the matter and energy in the universe and it's splitting into space in all directions at breakneck speed. From this matter and energy, a great balance was created consisting of galaxies, stars, sun, earth, and all other celestial bodies. Moreover, the laws were formed under the name of 'laws of physics', which are uniform and do not change throughout the universe. All this indicates that a perfect order arose after the Big Bang. The explosions, however, do not order. The presence of all observable explosions has a tendency to cause damage, chaos, and destruction. For example, nuclear and hydrogen bomb explosions, fire-damp explosions, volcanic eruptions, natural gas explosions, solar explosions: all of these have devastating effects. For example if we are introduced to a very wide order after an explosion if an explosion under the ground encourages huge works of art, huge palaces, or enclosed houses - can we conclude that there was a higher intelligence behind this explosion? And all the pieces scattered in the explosion were removed in a very controlled manner. This statement by Sir Fred Whale, who admitted his mistake many years after opposing the Big Bang Theory, illustrates the situation very well: The Big Bang Theory holds that the universe began in a single explosion. Yet as seen below, an explosion simply rips apart the subject, the Big Bang mysteriously creating the opposite effect as the matter spreads together in the form of galaxies. Noting that the Big Bang's way of ordering is retrograde, he certainly explains the Big Bank with a materialistic bias and assumes that it is an "uncontrolled explosion." In fact, he became self-contradictory with this kind of statement to refute the existence of the Creator. Because if a great order was raised about an explosion, the concept of "uncontrolled explosion" should have been kept separate and it should be accepted that the explosion was extraordinarily controlled, in other words, Almighty Allah initiated this explosion. Another aspect of this extraordinary order in the universe after the Big Bang is that the conditions for the formation of habitable planets in the "habitable universe" are so many and so complex that it is almost impossible to imagine that this formation is a coincidence. Paul Davis, a renowned professor of theoretical physics, calculated how the speed of expansion after the Big Bang was "subtly tuned" and he came to an incredible conclusion. According to Davis, if the rate of expansion after the Big Bang were separated by estimates of more than one billion to one billion, no habitable star-like structure could be formed: careful measurement kept the rate of expansion very close to criticism Whose value will expand. Slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly, slowly. It is interesting to ask precisely how finely the rate of expansion has been ‘in fine-tune’ for reading on this narrow dividing line between the two catastrophes? If at the time of I S (the pattern of expansion in that period was already firmly established) then the rate of expansion differs from its actual value by more than 10-18, it would be enough to throw the delicate balance. Clearly, there was no loud bang, but an explosion of wonderfully arranged vastness.7. The laws of physics that came together with the Big Bang have not changed completely for 15 billion years. Moreover, these laws are so carefully calculated that one millimeter of separation from their current values could result in the destruction of the entire structure and configuration of the universe.
Renowned physicist Professor Stephen Hawking, in his book A Brief History of Time, states that the universe has been determined by calculation and that balance has been more accurately preserved than we have imagined. Hawking says about the rate of expansion of the universe: If the rate of expansion per second after the Big Bang were smaller than one-millionth of a millionth, the universe would have split again before it reached its present size.8 Paul Davis also explained this remarkably accurate balance and the inevitable result Made: The current structure of the universe, for small changes in numbers Sensitive, however, it is difficult to resist the notion that the seemingly miraculous conformity of the numerical values that nature has determined to its fundamental constants must be the most striking evidence for the cosmic design element. An American professor wrote to him MIBOTIC UNIVERSE BOOK: After surveying all the evidence, the thought arose that some supernatural entity or agency could be called - this mind must be connected with Allah, the Almighty. Allah is the One who created everything with perfect order and perfect measure.
No comments